Miranda McIntyre

 MirandaM. McIntyre

Miranda M. McIntyre

  • Courses2
  • Reviews3

Biography

Purdue University West Lafayette - Psychology


Resume

  • 2008

    M.S.

    Thesis: \"Seeing people

    seeing things: Individual differences in selective attention\"

    Psychological Sciences

    Purdue University

    B.S. summa cum laude

    Honors Thesis: \"The development of exceptional scientific writing: A comparison of early and later career samples\"

    Psychology and English Language and Literature

    Central Michigan University

    Ph.D.

    with Graduate Certificate in Psychological Statistics\n\nDissertation: \"Self-other agreement in Person and Thing Orientations\"

    Psychological Sciences

    Purdue University

    Graduate Certificate in Psychological Statistics

  • Social Psychology

    University Teaching

    Higher Education

    Qualtrics

    Experimental Design

    Syllabus Development

    SPSS

    Personality Testing

    Regression Analysis

    Academic Writing

    Data Analysis

    R

    Research Design

    Psychometrics

    Experimental Psychology

    Quantitative Research

    Teaching

    Psychology

    Microsoft Office

    Instructional Design

    The associations of Greek and religious organization participation with college students’ social well-being and purpose.

    Two online-survey studies examined the associations of Greek (i.e.

    sorority and fraternity) and religious (i.e.

    church or campus ministry) organization participation with college students' social well-being and sense of purpose. In study 1 (N = 281)

    religious organization membership (versus no membership) was associated with connectedness and purpose

    but for Greek organizations the associations held only with respect to level of organization involvement. In study 2 (N = 426)

    Greek and religious organization membership were both associated with most social well-being and purpose indicators

    but only Greek membership was linked to lower loneliness. As in study 1

    level of involvement in Greek

    but not religious

    organizations was linked to social well-being. Hypothesized moderators of the associations between organization membership and the purpose and social well-being variables were not supported. We discuss implications for professionals who work with college students to promote well-being

    and we present future research ideas.

    The associations of Greek and religious organization participation with college students’ social well-being and purpose.

    Self-monitoring is a key element in interpersonal interactions

    guiding how people monitor and adjust their social behavior. Compared to low self-monitors

    high self-monitors are more sensitive to and use social cues to direct their self-presentations. However

    little work has examined whether high self-monitors possess a heightened capacity to cognitively process self-presentation information. The goal of the current work is to address this question. After exposure to impression-related (vs. control) words

    high (vs. low) self-monitors were faster to link positive (vs. neutral) traits to the self. The results show that high self-monitors have greater cognitive access to self-presentation information

    a finding that has heretofore been absent from the literature.

    Effects of self-monitoring on processing of self-presentation information

    The current work examined whether self-presentational efforts are influenced differently when people hold a goal to establish

    maintain or repair an interpersonal connection. Results supported the counterintuitive prediction that participants with a repair goal would convey a less favourably oriented persona (e.g. less friendly

    less similar and less genuine) compared to those with an establish or maintain goal. The efforts of repair goal participants were also perceived as less effective. The analysis also showed that certain self-presentation dimensions (i.e. friendliness

    genuineness and similarity) mediated the relationship between acceptance goals and perceived effectiveness. The findings extend and contribute to the self-presentation and belongingness literatures.

    The influence of acceptance goals on self-presentational efforts

    Individuals selectively orient toward their social environment (people) and toward their physical environment (things/objects). These orientations are key predictors of important life outcomes

    including career decisions. However

    research has not yet examined whether orientations toward people and things manifest in naturalistic environments. The present two-part study addressed this gap. In part one

    participants rated their interest in person- and thing-related books (e.g.

    on relationships; robots). Participants then took a camera home for several days to photograph anything or anyone they considered an important part of their life. In part two

    the photographs were submitted and coded for content. Results support the construct validity of person and thing orientations. Greater interest was expressed in orientation-related than unrelated books and photograph content was consistent with individuals' orientations. The findings suggest that person and thing orientations leave traces in everyday environments and behaviors. This research highlights implications for the development of interests and academic and occupational decision-making.

    A snapshot of Person and Thing Orientations: How individual differences in interest manifest in everyday life.

    We examined whether high self-monitors cognitively process self-presentation-related information and concepts more readily than low self-monitors. Results across three studies indicate that compared to low self-monitors

    high self-monitors have greater cognitive access to self-presentation-related information and concepts. High self-monitors produced more words related to self-presentation in a shorter amount of time (Study 1) and in a cognitive load condition (Study 2). In both studies

    the number of words did not differ when participants took longer to create their list and when they were in a no cognitive load condition. In Study 3

    high (vs. low) self-monitors showed faster reaction time to self-presentation-related concepts. In contrast

    reaction time to non-self-presentation items did not differ. The findings contribute to both the theory and knowledge of self-monitoring by demonstrating that information processing related to self-presentational concepts is an important component of self-monitoring

    in that such information is more cognitively accessible to high self-monitors.

    High self-monitors' cognitive access to self-presentation-related information

    Individuals differ in how they deploy attention to their physical and social environments. These differences have been recognized in various forms as orientations

    interests

    and preferences

    but empirical work examining these differences at a cognitive level is scarce. To address this gap

    we conducted two studies to explore the links among attentional processes and interests in people and things. The first study measured selective visual attention toward person- and thing-related image content. In the second study

    participants were randomly assigned to describe visually presented scenes using either an observational or narrative story format. Linguistic analyses were conducted to assess attentional bias toward interest-congruent content. Outcomes from both studies suggest that attention and motivational processes are linked to differential interests in physical and social environments.

    Seeing people

    seeing things: Individual differences in selective attention

    Miranda M.

    McIntyre

    Ph.D.

    Purdue University

    California State University-San Bernardino

    San Bernardino

    CA

    Assistant Professor

    California State University-San Bernardino

    West Lafayette

    Indiana

    Graduate Student Researcher

    Graduate Instructor

    Purdue University

PSY 120

4.5(1)

online

PSY 342

3.3(2)