Grant Madsen

 GrantC. Madsen

Grant C. Madsen

  • Courses1
  • Reviews4

Biography

Brigham Young University - American Studies


Resume

  • 2005

    PhD

    American History

    Michael and Ling Markovitz Dissertation Fellowship (2010-11)\nVon Holst Prize Lectureship (2008)\nDissertation Teaching and Research Fellowship (2007)\nVon Holst Prize Lectureship (declined) (2007)\nHumane Studies Fellowship (2006

    2009)\nCollege Lecturer (2005

    2007)\nBessie Pierce Prize Preceptor (2004

    2006)\nMellon Achievement Award (2001-2004)\nMann Travel Grant (2008)\nFreehling Research Travel Award (May 2005

    October 2006)

    University of Chicago

  • 1993

    MA

    English Literature

  • 1988

    BA

    English Major

    German Minor

    Cum Laude\nPhi Kappa Phi National Honor Society\nGolden Key National Honor Society

  • University Teaching

    Grant Writing

    College Teaching

    Politics

    Academic Writing

    Qualitative Research

    Student Affairs

    Teaching

    Higher Education

    American History

    Literature

    Research

    History

    Program Development

    Statistics

    Economics

    Tutoring

    Editing

    Political Economy

    Sovereign Soldiers: How the U.S. Military Transformed the Global Economy After World War II

    They helped conquer the greatest armies ever assembled. Yet no sooner had they tasted victory after World War II than American generals suddenly found themselves governing their former enemies

    devising domestic policy and making critical economic decisions for people they had just defeated in battle. In postwar Germany and Japan

    this authority fell into the hands of Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur

    along with a cadre of military officials like Lucius Clay and the Detroit banker Joseph Dodge.\n\nIn Sovereign Soldiers

    I tell the story of how this cast of characters assumed an unfamiliar and often untold policymaking role. Seeking to avoid the harsh punishments meted out after World War I

    military leaders believed they had to rebuild and rehabilitate their former enemies; if they failed they might cause an even deadlier World War III. Although they knew economic recovery would be critical in their effort

    none was schooled in economics. Beyond their hopes

    they managed to rebuild not only their former enemies but the entire western economy during the early Cold War.\n\nI show how army leaders learned from the people they governed

    drawing expertise that they ultimately brought back to the United States during the Eisenhower Administration in 1953. Sovereign Soldiers thus traces the circulation of economic ideas around the globe and back to the United States

    with the American military at the helm.

    Sovereign Soldiers: How the U.S. Military Transformed the Global Economy After World War II

    The International Origins of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Political Economy

    Because of the global nature of the Depression

    War

    and Cold War

    America’s experiments in state-building occurred concurrent to (and in competition with) fascist and communist alternatives; American state-building could not avoid comparison to its alternatives. Nowhere was the comparison more intense than in the occupied territories of Germany and Japan after World War II. There military governors built new German and Japanese states using the rubble of fascism and militarism while working (to varying degrees) in concert and competition with Soviet communists. \nNew Dealers had relied upon exceptionalist accounts of American state-building to legitimize their own domestic project and distinguish it from Nazism and communism. They saw Germans and Japanese as alien Others

    requiring extensive rehabilitation and supervision as part of a New Deal “for the World.” America’s occupiers

    sympathizing with their former enemies

    came to reject not only the “otherness” of the Germans and Japanese but also the exceptionalism that lay behind it. Indeed

    within a few years of running the occupations

    many in the military government had come to see the Germans and Japanese as similar to Americans; similarly

    they saw the German and Japanese turn to militarism as a harbinger of what might happen to any modern state if it poor policies. In particular

    they became intensely concerned with the dangers associated that followed government deficit spending and inflation.\nSince America’s military governors developed their political economy upon the ashes of Nazism and Japanese militarism

    their views took on an intensely moral hue. Americans had long believed in balancing government budgets as a matter of “good housekeeping.” For occupation officials

    however

    balanced budgets came to symbolize the essence of democratic stability

    and inflation came to symbolize the early signs of moral collapse

    even the first inroads of a “creeping paralysis” leading to dictatorship.

    Lessons of Victory: Occupying Germany and Japan

    Discovering the People's Capitalism

    For students of American Political Development

    the emergence of globalization and Americanization as themes of inquiry has spurred a growing interest in explaining America's rise as “a legal-economic and geopolitical hegemon.” An important episode in this rise came during the American occupation of Germany after World War II. In postwar Germany

    America's military government realized that the American public remained unwilling to support (over the long term) the global projection of what Michael Mann has called “despotic power.” To achieve its fundamental goal of reorienting Germany toward a peaceful coexistence with the Unites States

    military government turned instead to what Mann has called “infrastructural power” (power projected “through” society by state institutions). In pivoting from despotic to infrastructural power

    three important consequences followed for the occupation. (1) Because it relied on the development of new infrastructures within a new German state

    the occupation saw institutional “genesis” in which the Germans themselves influenced the pathway and timing of military government policy. (2) In creating new state institutions

    military government performed “policy bricolage

    ” creatively reconstructing institutions “from” the ruins of war-torn Europe (as opposed to “on” its ruins). (3) Financial policy took a central place in military government's focus because it allowed for “increasing returns” in advancing military government's interests. Collectively

    military government's experience provided lessons for an American state in the world.

    Becoming a State-in-the-World: Lessons Learned from the American Occupation of Germany

    Grant

    Madsen

    University of Chicago

    Department of History

    National Association of Home Builders

    Brigham Young University

    United States Senate

    Provo

    Utah Area

    My research focuses on intellectual

    political and economic history.

    Assistant Professor

    Brigham Young University

    I prepared legislative reports

    managed the Committee’s library

    oversaw legislative correspondents

    and researched legislation.

    United States Senate

    Legislative Director

    Environment

    I lobbied on behalf of the Homebuilders. My areas of expertise included the Clean Water Act

    Clean Air Act

    CERCLA ("Superfund") and other land use legislation.

    National Association of Home Builders

    Resident Head

    Office of Undergraduate Student Housing

    My wife and I managed an undergraduate dormitory of 100 students (Maclean House). We provided academic guidance and personal counseling

    programmed activities

    enforced the University's code of conduct

    and worked to build a community conducive to academic success for our students.

    University of Chicago

    Graduate Student

    University of Chicago

    University of Chicago

    Department of History

AHTG 100

4.4(4)