Benjamin Baran

 Benjamin Baran

Benjamin E. Baran

  • Courses4
  • Reviews4

Biography

Cleveland State University - Management


Resume

  • 2018

    Joint Professional Military Education Phase II

    National Defense University

  • 2015

    Joint Professional Military Education Phase I

    U.S. Naval War College

  • 2007

    M.A.

    Industrial/Organizational Psychology

    Ph.D.

    Organizational Science

    University of North Carolina at Charlotte

  • 1998

    B.A.

    Political Science

    Communication

    Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR)

    Human Resources Certification Institute

    SHRM-SCP

    SHRM

  • Change Management

    Organizational Effectiveness

    Training

    Job Analysis

    Leadership Development

    Performance Management

    Talent Management

    Performance Appraisal

    Personnel Management

    Data Analysis

    Employee Training

    Organizational Development

    Strategy

    Leadership

    Interviews

    Qualitative Data

    Project Management

    Survey Design

    Research Design

    Research

    High-reliability HR: Preparing the enterprise for catastrophes

    In a turbulent

    unpredictable world

    organizations face many threats. Some of those threats can devolve into catastrophes when left unchecked. The principles of high reliability

    previously unapplied directly to the HR function

    provide key insights into how organizations today can better ensure their preparedness. This article explains this framework

    followed by validating evidence from a study of a major university that conducted a large-scale exercise to prepare itself for the possibility of an active shooter on campus. The lessons provided apply directly to senior administrators and other leaders within the higher-education domain

    but they also contain insights that apply broadly to other sectors and industries. The idea of high-reliability HR and its proposed practices are important for HR leaders and executives of all types seeking to better prepare their organizations for catastrophes.

    High-reliability HR: Preparing the enterprise for catastrophes

    How human resource management professionals view organizational change and their roles in it matters because those perceptions serve as a foundation for how they define their roles and as a boundary for what they might see as possible. Despite the importance of understanding these perspectives

    few studies have explored human resources professionals’ views of organizational change and their roles in it. Data from 547 human resources professionals across a wide range of industries and organizational levels reveal the perception of top-leader involvement in 80 percent of successful changes. The data also suggest that human resources professionals hold numerous roles in change efforts

    including those of ‘change agent’ and ‘consultant.’ Additionally

    the data revealed that most human resource management professionals tended to view successful organizational change as primarily occurring in a top-down

    hierarchical manner. A minority – yet potentially consequential – portion of the respondents viewed their role in organizational change as limited or not very important. We discuss these findings in light of relevant theoretical frameworks of organizational change

    offering practical and scholarly implications.

    Organizational change: Perspectives from human resource management.

    Mindy Bergman

    Christiane Spitzmüller

    Dirty work involves tasks that are stigmatized owing to characteristics that the public finds disgusting

    degrading

    or objectionable. Conservation of resources theory suggests such experiences should induce strain and decreased work satisfaction; social identity theory suggests such work should lead to strong psychological investment in the work

    among other outcomes. Integrating these two perspectives

    this study hypothesizes and presents quantitative evidence from 499 animal-shelter workers

    demonstrating how dirty-work engagement relates to higher levels of strain

    job involvement

    and reluctance to discuss work while negatively influencing work satisfaction. Additionally

    this study takes a unique perspective on dirty work by focusing on dirty tasks within a dirty-work occupation. The data suggest meaningful differences between the outcomes of dirty-task frequency and dirty-task psychological salience

    providing additional insight into the complexity of stigmatized occupations and ways in which future research and theory benefit as a result.

    Shouldering a silent burden: The toll of dirty work

    Sorin Valcea

    In the United States

    employment is the cornerstone of the refugee resettlement process because of its centrality in providing self-sufficiency. Job searching and navigating employment relationships are difficult for refugees

    however

    because it necessarily coincides with the adversity of integrating into a new culture. This exploratory inquiry draws upon two data sources—in-depth interviews with both refugees and employees of refugee assistance organizations and a survey of refugees—to provide insight into the lived experiences

    narrative chronology

    and the role of expectations and psychological contracts in the employment process. The data

    viewed in light of social cognitive career theory

    suggest a complex trajectory of expectations

    adversity

    turning points

    and status changes as refugees attempt to “make it” in the United States. Additionally

    we provide evidence that refugees develop unrealistically positive expectations about life in the United States

    face significant underemployment

    experience job dissatisfaction when underemployed

    and

    in some cases

    consider abandoning their pursuit of the “American dream” when highly dissatisfied with their jobs.

    Survival

    expectations

    and employment: An inquiry of refugees and immigrants to the United States

    This study investigated the role of after-action reviews on perceptions of safety climate at the group and organizational levels. Moderated and mediated regression analyses of data from 67 firefighting crews suggest that after-action review frequency positively influenced both levels of safety climate. Safety-oriented group norms fully mediated the relationship between after-action review frequency and group-level safety climate. Fire-station busyness moderated the relationship between after-action review frequency and organizational-level safety climate

    such that the relationship was non-existent for highly busy stations. These findings suggest that after-action reviews constitute a specific venue through which managers can promote safety climate in high-risk environments.

    After-action reviews: A venue for the promotion of safety climate.

    John Crowe

    The tension between work and non-work life remains a critical issue in contemporary careers. This study explores the role of organizational identification (OI) in reducing work–family conflict (WFC) within demanding and high-stakes jobs in dynamic

    uncertain and potentially dangerous contexts (e.g.

    firefighting). Survey data from 341 firefighters suggest that

    congruent with conservation of resources theory and scarcity theory

    OI may serve as a resource that mitigates WFC in these contexts. Additionally

    the data suggest that the negative relationship between OI and WFC is stronger when trauma is low. For practice

    this study provides important implications for employees in similar contexts concerning potential ways to mitigate WFC as well as recommendations concerning exposure to trauma.

    Organizational identification: A context-specific mitigating resource of work-family conflict

    Linda Shanock

    Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

    86: 457-476

    This study adds to the growing body of research on work meetings and extends the emotional labour literature beyond a service context by examining the relationship between surface acting during meetings and perceived meeting effectiveness. Additionally

    the relationships of surface acting during meetings and perceived meeting effectiveness with time-lagged reports of intention to quit and emotional exhaustion 3 months later were investigated. Structural equation modelling of data from 178 working adults revealed negative relationships between surface acting and perceptions of meeting effectiveness. Perceived meeting effectiveness partially mediated the relationship between surface acting and both intention to quit and emotional exhaustion 3 months later. These findings expand both the limited research on perceived meeting effectiveness and the surface acting nomological network to include a consideration that expressing inauthentic emotions in meetings (surface acting) may relate to the perceived effectiveness of the meeting. As well

    both surface acting during meetings and perceived meeting effectiveness may relate to how emotionally exhausted employees feel and their intentions to seek other employment. Given the cost and pervasiveness of meetings in daily organizational life and their potential effects on the well-being of employees

    understanding how to make meetings effective is paramount – particularly if researchers and practitioners want to better understand how perceived meeting effectiveness may be related to various employee outcomes.

    Less acting

    more doing: How surface acting relates to perceived meeting effectiveness and other employee outcomes

    David Altman

    Tammy Beck

    Linda Shanock

    Purpose – The theoretical and practical criticality of self-talk for leader success receives extensive multidisciplinary discussion

    without a great deal of empirical research given the challenge of assessing actual self-talk. The purpose of this paper is to advance research and theory on self-leadership by examining leader self-talk and its relationship to effectiveness and strain. \n\nDesign/methodology/approach – In total

    189 senior executives' self-addressed

    future-oriented letters were collected. The executives wrote these letters to themselves for their own personal development; thus

    the language used represented a form of naturally occurring self-talk. Two types of self-talk were coded: constructive and dysfunctional. Supervisor and direct report ratings of leadership of others and creativity and self-ratings of job strain were collected. \n\nFindings – Extensive variability among leaders in constructive self-talk was found. Exemplars of constructive and dysfunctional self-talk are presented. Constructive self-talk positively related to effective leadership of others and creativity/originality as evaluated by subordinates and superiors and was negatively related to job strain. Dysfunctional self-talk related negatively to creativity/originality. \n\nOriginality/value – In addition to illustrating the types of self-talk used by leaders

    research is extended by providing some of the first empirical evidence of how leaders' free-flowing thoughts are related to their effectiveness and their overall well-being

    lending direct support to a principal proposition from the self-leadership framework.

    The executive mind: An examination of top leaders’ self-talk

    effectiveness

    and job strain

    Stacy Clever Pattison

    Linda Shanock

    Journal of Business and Psychology

    25: 543-554

    Polynomial regression with response surface analysis is a sophisticated statistical approach that has become increasingly popular in multisource feedback research (e.g.

    self-observer rating discrepancy). The approach allows researchers to examine the extent to which combinations of two predictor variables relate to an outcome variable

    particularly in the case when the discrepancy (difference) between the two predictor variables is a central consideration. We believe this approach has potential for application to a wide variety of research questions. To enhance interest and use of this technique

    we provide ideas for future research directions that might benefit from the application of this analytic tool. We also walk through a step-by-step example of how to conduct polynomial regression and response surface analysis and provide all the tools you will need to do the analyses and graph the results (including SPSS syntax

    formulas

    and a downloadable Excel spreadsheet). Our example involves how discrepancies in perceived supervisor and organizational support relate to affective commitment. Finally

    we discuss how this approach is a better

    more informative alternative to difference scores and can be applied to the examination of two-way interactions in moderated regression.

    Polynomial regression and response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores

    Lindsay R. Miller

    Linda Rhoades Shanock

    Purpose \nThis review focuses and aids the development of organizational support theory

    which explains relationships between employers and employees based on social exchange. Many studies have explored the theory’s central construct

    perceived organizational support (POS)

    or the degree to which employees believe their work organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being. Since the last review of POS literature in 2000

    the occupational landscape has shifted

    increasing nontraditional work relationships and the importance of managing an international workforce while considering influences on employee well-being. This review discusses how the recent POS research reflects these trends. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach \nThis review focused on how themes in the POS research since 2000 have enhanced organizational support theory as relevant to the twenty-first century world of work. \nFindings \nFour important theoretical themes have developed since 2000 that enhance organizational support theory: considerations of employee well-being

    nontraditional workers

    international and cross-cultural issues

    and developments tied to the use of multilevel modeling. \nImplications \nGiving both researchers and practitioners a synthesized view of the current status of POS research

    this review serves as a springboard for new developments. It also integrates the multitude of recent studies into organizational support theory

    focusing theoretical progress. \nOriginality/Value \nThis is the first review and theoretical integration of the POS literature since 2002. It is a valuable resource for all interested in the field

    with theoretical insights

    useful tables

    explanatory figures

    and references.

    Advancing organizational support theory into the twenty-first century world of work

    Linda Shanock

    This study focuses on a common-yet-understudied group process: supervisor-led group meetings at work. Specifically

    the study explores the relationships among employees’ perceptions and reported behaviors with regard to such meetings. Respondents are 291 adults working in different organizations. Structural equation modeling of the data largely supports the hypothesized model. Employee perceptions of relationship quality with their supervisors (leader–member exchange) fully mediates the relationship between perceptions of supervisors’ fairness (interactional justice) in group meetings and perceived organizational support. Leader–member exchange also fully mediates the relationship between interactional justice perceptions and meeting citizenship behaviors—a new construct describing extra-role behaviors that support meeting processes—and between good meeting practices by the supervisors and meeting citizenship behaviors. Leader–member exchange partially mediates the relationship between good meeting practices and perceived organizational support. These findings highlight the importance both of supervisors’ behaviors within meetings that they lead and of the supervisor-led group meeting itself as a phenomenon worthy of future exploration.

    Leading group meetings: Supervisors’ actions

    employee behaviors

    and upward perceptions

    et al.

    Jennifer B. Webb

    Natalie A. DiGiacomo

    Christiane Spitzmüller

    Objective—To identify and evaluate coping strategies advocated by experienced animal shelter workers who directly engaged in euthanizing animals.\nDesign—Cross-sectional study.\nSample Population—Animal shelters across the United States in which euthanasia was conducted (5 to 100 employees/shelter).\nProcedures—With the assistance of experts associated with the Humane Society of the United States

    the authors identified 88 animal shelters throughout the United States in which animal euthanasia was actively conducted and for which contact information regarding the shelter director was available. Staff at 62 animal shelters agreed to participate in the survey. Survey packets were mailed to the 62 shelter directors

    who then distributed them to employees. The survey included questions regarding respondent age

    level of education

    and role and asked those directly involved in the euthanasia of animals to provide advice on strategies for new euthanasia technicians to deal with the related stress. Employees completed the survey and returned it by mail. Content analysis techniques were used to summarize survey responses.\nResults—Coping strategies suggested by 242 euthanasia technicians were summarized into 26 distinct coping recommendations in 8 categories: competence or skills strategies

    euthanasia behavioral strategies

    cognitive or self-talk strategies

    emotional regulation strategies

    separation strategies

    get-help strategies

    seek long-term solution strategies

    and withdrawal strategies.\nConclusions and Clinical Relevance—Euthanizing animals is a major stressor for many animal shelter workers. Information regarding the coping strategies identified in this study may be useful for training new euthanasia technicians.

    Euthanasia-related strain and coping strategies in animal shelter employees

    Leaders in high-reliability organizational contexts such as firefighting

    emergency medicine

    and law enforcement often face the challenge of making sense of environments that are dangerous

    highly ambiguous

    and rapidly changing. Most leadership research

    however

    has focused on more stable conditions. This study analyzed 100 reports of “near-miss” situations in which firefighters narrowly escaped injury or death

    drawing upon sensemaking and high-reliability organizational theories to provide a grounded theory of leadership processes within extreme events. Themes related to direction setting

    knowledge

    talk

    role acting

    role modeling

    trust

    situational awareness

    and agility were key categories. Further abstraction of the data revealed the higher-order categories of framing

    heedful interrelating

    and adjusting as key characteristics of the overall social process of leadership within dangerous contexts

    labeled organizing ambiguity. These findings highlight leadership as a collective sensemaking process in which ambiguity is reduced and resilience promoted in the face of danger via interaction among and between leaders and followers.

    Organizing ambiguity: A grounded theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts

    Thomas Clausen

    Slaughterhouse workers face the reality of industrialized meat production on a daily basis

    experiencing firsthand the routinized killing of animals. This occupation provides a window through which to view one key way in which animals and organizations intersect in modern society. Given its proximity to death and undesirable required tasks

    working in a slaughterhouse is classified as ‘dirty work’. Current theorizing

    however

    does not address how the intentional killing of animals may impact workers beyond its inherent dirtiness and low prestige. In this study

    we draw upon and extend dirty work theory to further understand the unique nature of work that involves the intentional killing of animals. Regression analyses of data from 10

    605 Danish workers across 44 occupations suggest that slaughterhouse workers consistently experience lower physical and psychological well-being along with increased incidences of negative coping behavior. Our findings hold while statistically controlling for occupational prestige and overall dirtiness. Additionally

    we compare the pattern of results with a comparable occupation that does not involve animal killing

    suggesting specific outcomes associated with routinized killing of animals. Building upon extant research and considering our findings

    we discuss the theoretical implications regarding dirty work and the intentional killing of animals in organizations.

    Routinized killing of animals: Going beyond dirty work and prestige to understand the well-being of slaughterhouse workers

    Dave Murphy

    The after-action review (AAR) is a discussion technique some high-reliability organizations employ to encourage learning via collective retrospection. AARs are an effective communication tool for promoting reliability if they are held regularly. One way to encourage frequent AARs is to increase participants’ satisfaction with these meetings. This study examined the impact of post-incident

    pre-discussion ambiguity and freedom of dissent on participant satisfaction with AARs. Firefighters (N = 119) completed a survey on their most recent AAR. As predicted

    the level of post-incident

    pre-discussion ambiguity was negatively related to AAR satisfaction. Freedom of dissent

    however

    attenuated the negative influence of ambiguity on AAR satisfaction.

    Ambiguity and freedom of dissent in post-incident discussion

    This article suggests important ways in which organizations should approach leadership development for organizational crises. In particular

    such organizations should consider the use of simulations

    learning from others' mistakes

    and communication training to increase their leadership capacity.

    Preparing for the unthinkable: Leadership development for organizational crises

    Ben

    Baran

    Ph.D.

    SPHR

    UNC Charlotte

    Agility Consulting and Training

    Organizational Science Consulting & Research

    Cleveland State University

    Northern Kentucky University

    Indigo Anchor

    Gild Collective

    U.S. Navy

    US Navy Reserve

    At Indigo Anchor

    we believe that the world is better when humans flourish at work. A cutting-edge management consulting firm

    we are dedicated to helping leaders

    employees

    and their organizations. By tackling workplace challenges with agile

    science-based

    accessible methods

    we provide or create field-tested solutions that fit your needs.

    Indigo Anchor

    Consultant

    Key contributor and project manager on a number of consulting engagements.

    Organizational Science Consulting & Research

    Internal Communications Manager

    Managed and edited all internal communications from the university’s Office of Public Relations.

    UNC Charlotte

    Organizational Researcher

    Doctoral Candidate

    Responsibilities included providing expert research and teaching assistance in support of making progress toward earning a Ph.D. in organizational science

    which is an interdisciplinary approach toward studying human behavior at work

    coordination of organizing processes

    and the role of organizations in society at large.

    UNC Charlotte

    Cleveland State University

    Within the university's Monte Ahuja College of Business

    my teaching and research focuses on human resource management and organizational behavior.

    Assistant Professor of Management

    Cleveland/Akron

    Ohio Area

    I was commissioned as an officer in the U.S. Navy in 2002 through Villanova University’s Naval Reserve Officer Training Corps program. After completing my active duty service obligation

    I have continued to serve in the U.S. Navy's reserve component

    currently at the rank of commander. I'm a member of the Human Resources Officer community

    which supports the Navy's personnel management

    requirements

    recruiting

    and training needs. \n\nSince December 2016

    I have been a member of Navy Reserve CNO-N1 Navy Total Force

    in which I currently serve as the Chief Staff Officer.

    US Navy Reserve

    Advisory Board Member

    Gild Collective inspires women to lead and live with greater confidence and passion. Specifically

    Gild Collective offers creative workshops that focus on the unique challenges of women at work

    guiding groups through thought-provoking discussion and exercises--ending with a creative project. \n\nIn my role

    I provide perspective on Gild Collective's services through the lens of human resources and the scientific research related to the issues they address. \n\nCheck them out today!

    Gild Collective

    Surface Warfare Officer

    While at sea

    was responsible for safe navigation and proper operation of all equipment onboard a $1.2 billion warship.\n\nAboard USS Preble (DDG 88)

    I served in a number of roles

    including:\n\nAssistant Chief Engineer. Responsible for administration of 63-person Engineering Department. Assisted planning all maintenance

    repairs

    and training. Ensured proper reporting of all equipment and personnel status by four division officers.\n\nPublic Affairs Officer. Primary point of contact for all media

    tours

    and special events.\n\nElectrical Division Officer. Officer in charge of the ship’s Electrical Division. Directly supervised eight electricians. Administered two safety programs ensuring safe operation of ship’s engineering plant.\n\nCombat Systems Training Officer. Supervised four personnel and training within the 51-person Combat Systems Department. Researched and promulgated guidelines for departmental training.

    U.S. Navy

    Northern Kentucky University

    Within Northern Kentucky University's Haile/US Bank College of Business

    my teaching and research focused on human resource management

    organizational behavior and related topics. One of the many highlights during my time at NKU was teaching in its Executive Leadership and Organizational Change master's program--a unique degree that

    according to its students

    \"changes lives.\" I was also honored to be awarded the 2012 Dean's Citation for Outstanding Teaching

    which is the top teaching award in the college.

    Assistant Professor of Management

    Cincinnati

    Ohio Area

    Studied requisite knowledge for Surface Warfare Officers. Graduated with honors for overall grade point average. Recognized for highest grade point average in engineering curriculum.

    US Navy

    Practice Leader

    Agility Analytics

    Agility Consulting and Training has four practice areas: Leadership Agility

    Team Agility

    Organizational Agility

    and Agility Analytics. I'm the practice leader for Agility Analytics

    which \nseeks to become the leading provider of research-based assessments

    methods and ideas that unlock the agile potential of leaders

    teams and organizations. \n\nI also work directly with clients as a facilitator and consultant

    primarily in helping executives and their teams develop and implement strategic initiatives that drive their organization's ability to be focused

    fast and flexible.

    Agility Consulting and Training

    Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology